Add first contribution to the main graph!

.gitignore

@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 *.obsidian*
+*/etc/*

dgraph/Main/{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence.md

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+- informs [[{Q} Why use Discourse Graphs for distributed research?]]
+
+Quite literally, DGs help keep members on the same page. For example:
+- DGs make it easier to see the big picture or zoom into details 
+- DGs make it easier to explore the research frontier, by looking at unanswered questions or unsubstantiated claims.

dgraph/Main/{CLM} There is little attention in the scientific literature to the topic of tools supporting distributed research.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+- informs [[{Q} How common is the use of discourse graphs for research?]]
+- generates [[{Q} What tools are employed today by distributed research teams?]] 
+
+Ronen- the science community generates a lot of research but much less of this kind of "meta research" - research about how we do research, what tools we use etc.

dgraph/Main/{CLM} Very few teams use Discourse Graphs or graph-based similar methods.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- informs [[{Q} How common is the use of discourse graphs for research?]]
+- opposes [[{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence]]
+
+Not sure if opposes [[{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence]] is the right relation, but there is definitely tension between these two claims: if DGs are so useful, why do so few teams use them?
+
+- generates [[{Q} Why do few teams use DGs?]]

dgraph/{P} Discourse Graph Grammar.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ This document is subject to adaptation as we experiment with new node and edge t
 
 # Node types
 
-- QUE - Question
+- Q - Question
 - CLM - Claim
 - EVD - Evidence
 - SRC - Source
@@ -12,10 +12,12 @@ This document is subject to adaptation as we experiment with new node and edge t
 All node names should be prefixed with  {`type`}, e.g., `{SRC} Example Source`
 
 # Edge types
+(based on https://oasislab.pubpub.org/pub/54t0y9mk#7c8st7en56)
 
-- EVD or CLM Informs QUE
-- EVD Supports CLM
-- EVD Opposes CLM
+- EVD or CLM Informs Q (for EVD created in response to an existing Q)
+- EVD or CLM Generates Q (for EVD or CLM resulting in a new Q)
+- EVD Support/Opposes CLM
+- CLM Supports/Opposes CLM
 - SRC Contains EVD (optional - may be omitted since only one type of SRC-EVD edge possible)
 
 All edges should conform to one of the following types, along with the source and target node types.