Compare commits
	
		
			No commits in common. "178086f72b78c594a64bafe2f8d005a93e65f9ca" and "595df422f37a5b544d58a195be5a6110c660405d" have entirely different histories.
		
	
	
		
			178086f72b
			...
			595df422f3
		
	
		| 
						 | 
					@ -1,2 +1 @@
 | 
				
			||||||
*.obsidian*
 | 
					*.obsidian*
 | 
				
			||||||
*/etc/*
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
| 
						 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
| 
						 | 
					@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
 | 
				
			||||||
- informs [[{Q} Why use Discourse Graphs for distributed research?]]
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
Quite literally, DGs help keep members on the same page. For example:
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
- DGs make it easier to see the big picture or zoom into details 
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
- DGs make it easier to explore the research frontier, by looking at unanswered questions or unsubstantiated claims.
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
| 
						 | 
					@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
 | 
				
			||||||
- informs [[{Q} How common is the use of discourse graphs for research?]]
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
- generates [[{Q} What tools are employed today by distributed research teams?]] 
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
Ronen- the science community generates a lot of research but much less of this kind of "meta research" - research about how we do research, what tools we use etc.
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
| 
						 | 
					@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
 | 
				
			||||||
- informs [[{Q} How common is the use of discourse graphs for research?]]
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
- opposes [[{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence]]
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
Not sure if opposes [[{CLM} Discourse Graphs help maintain group coherence]] is the right relation, but there is definitely tension between these two claims: if DGs are so useful, why do so few teams use them?
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
- generates [[{Q} Why do few teams use DGs?]]
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
| 
						 | 
					@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ This document is subject to adaptation as we experiment with new node and edge t
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
# Node types
 | 
					# Node types
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
- Q - Question
 | 
					- QUE - Question
 | 
				
			||||||
- CLM - Claim
 | 
					- CLM - Claim
 | 
				
			||||||
- EVD - Evidence
 | 
					- EVD - Evidence
 | 
				
			||||||
- SRC - Source
 | 
					- SRC - Source
 | 
				
			||||||
| 
						 | 
					@ -12,12 +12,10 @@ This document is subject to adaptation as we experiment with new node and edge t
 | 
				
			||||||
All node names should be prefixed with  {`type`}, e.g., `{SRC} Example Source`
 | 
					All node names should be prefixed with  {`type`}, e.g., `{SRC} Example Source`
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
# Edge types
 | 
					# Edge types
 | 
				
			||||||
(based on https://oasislab.pubpub.org/pub/54t0y9mk#7c8st7en56)
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
- EVD or CLM Informs Q (for EVD created in response to an existing Q)
 | 
					- EVD or CLM Informs QUE
 | 
				
			||||||
- EVD or CLM Generates Q (for EVD or CLM resulting in a new Q)
 | 
					- EVD Supports CLM
 | 
				
			||||||
- EVD Support/Opposes CLM
 | 
					- EVD Opposes CLM
 | 
				
			||||||
- CLM Supports/Opposes CLM
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
- SRC Contains EVD (optional - may be omitted since only one type of SRC-EVD edge possible)
 | 
					- SRC Contains EVD (optional - may be omitted since only one type of SRC-EVD edge possible)
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
All edges should conform to one of the following types, along with the source and target node types.
 | 
					All edges should conform to one of the following types, along with the source and target node types.
 | 
				
			||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue